16.5 C
Meru
Friday, November 22, 2024

Kawira Mwangaza: Propaganda won’t scare me

Must read

The report prepared by Kawira Mwangaza’s political opponents in order to smear her name has been released.

Many lies and other perplexing propaganda have been published in the Star newspaper, as well as other media outlets, television stations, and radio stations.

They’ve all planned to scare Kawira Mwangaza and paint a negative picture of her so that she won’t run for governor in 2022.

When you look closely at the accusations, you will notice that they have singled out ten women. Only two of the ten women are not running for governor in their respective counties in 2022.

The remaining eight women aspire to be governor in 2022.

This is what has been planned as a political attack to prevent these women from running for governor in their respective counties.

It implies that the accusations are what is known as propaganda.

Propaganda is heavily developed during politics and when elections are approaching.

To those who know and those who don’t, one of the goals of propaganda is to confuse voters’ minds so that even if they knew who was the best, they see that person as unfit for them.

The first lie to disagree with is where the propaganda claims that there is no plan to show how Mwangaza GBV Resource and Rescue center will operate on a daily basis.

The government does not undertake any construction project, such as a classroom, a road, a house, or a hall, without first considering a community proposal.

This means that the government, through the Meru Ngaaf, began constructing the Mwangaza GBV Resource and Rescue Center after receiving proposals.

The government examined the proposal using its own systems, such as the system for public works, the NGAAF committee in Nairobi, and many other systems and determined that it was valid, ensuring that no government funds would be lost.

It is the reason they agreed to take on the project.

The government could not have agreed to undertake a construction project if the project’s operation had not been planned.

So, why did the government agree to carry out the project? The construction project was not undertaken by Kawira Mwangaza.

She was not given any funds to carry out the construction.

The proposal was forwarded to the government by Kawira mwangaza and the Meru community.

The government recognized the need for the project and undertook construction on its own.

The procurement was handled by the government.

The big question is whether the government can look at the proposal and determine that the project is a good idea, then release the funds and carry out the construction for the community only to correct itself later.

That is the first propaganda and lie planned by Kawira Mwangaza’s political opponents in order to paint a negative picture of her and destroy her reputation on radio stations, television stations, newspapers, and people with badmouths.

The second lie, or propaganda number two, so that you can see how today’s politics is meant to damage other people’s names, is that they claim that the Meru bursaries have been awarded without evidence of public participation.

Lack of public participation means that when students are selected for bursaries by Kawira Mwangaza and Meru NGAAF, they are not chosen in front of the public.

That is a big lie because there is no other leader in Meru County who selects students when the people are watching.

A beneficiary is chosen, and everyone agrees that he or she is deserving of the bursary.

The public responds and agrees that a selected beneficiary should receive the bursaries.

All of Kawira Mwangaza’s bursaries are distributed to media outlets and baite TV.

When she visits the community, this is how the students are chosen from the community.

The people are the ones who hand over the students who are facing difficulties to Kawira Mwangaza.

She collects the names and forwards them to NGAAF in Nairobi.

The NGAAF committee in Nairobi prepares and recommends which children should be awarded and which should not be awarded bursaries.

Kawira Mwangaza has always been on record that she is not the one who gives out money.

The cheques are returned to Meru and distributed to those who have been accepted by the Nairobi NGAAF Board.

So we’ve seen the first lie because bursaries of the Meru NGAAF are selected in public as the people choose who gets awarded.

This means that the accusations of a lack of evidence of public participation are false, and if there is a leader who prepares and executes a well-executed public participation, it is none other than Bishop Kawira Mwangaza.

The reason for this is that we have seen her going around different communities conducting public participation and being presented with students who will be awarded bursaries.

“I have never seen an MCA hold a public participation when selecting students on his or her own and going to communities to request that students be handed over in order to educate them,” said Murega Baichu.

“If one has ever done this, may God bless them.

“I have never seen an MP go into a community and announce that he has arrived and ask for students to educate them.

“If one has ever done this, may God bless them.

“I’ve never seen Governor Kiaritu Murungi go to the public and say that now that he’s arrived, he’d like to be handed over students by the community to educate them in the same way that Kawira Mwangaza does.

if he has ever done so, it is well.

“I have never seen Meru County Senator Mithika Linturi go out into the community and ask for students to educate them.

If he has never done that, it is well, and may he be blessed.

“I have never seen CS Munya Gatirau go to communities and ask the people to give him several students so that he can educate them.

“May he be blessed if he has ever done that.

“On that note, we have seen Kawira Mwangaza visiting communities and requesting that students be handed over in order to educate them while conducting public participation in the proper manner,” he said.

Kawira Mwangaza issued a statement in which she stated that there is no propaganda, mudslinging, or accusation that will shake her.

She is going straight to the ballot box and is prepared to compete with those who have declared their intention to run for the seat.

She has told them that they will meet at the ballot in 2022, whether it is Kiraitu Murungi or Peter Munya or all three of them and others added to the list.

- Advertisement -spot_img

More articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisement -spot_img

Latest article